How about the option to put the same bet on with different bookies due to account limits?. Lets say I can only get part of the stake on with the best value bookmaker and the rest on with another bookmaker, it would be useful if this option was available so that I could see the aggregate price of the bet across a number of bookies
1 Like
This is a cool idea we have considered before. But not sure how many would use it.
Right now you can change options to only Hide odds āon current bookmakerā, and do this manually.
I know this has been request before. But when do you think you implement the closing odds in the bets?
I canāt give a precise date, but itās quite high up on our priority list.
ä½ å„½ļ¼ęä¹ęÆäøå½ēļ¼åÆ仄ęäøŗęååļ¼
Could you add a little bit of arbing on Valuebetting too? I was thinking like, arbs with really low or even zero profit. Arbs where the low odds are in a sharp bookmaker and high odds in a soft bookmaker. For example 1X2 odds 1.14-11-35. Mathematicly there is about 88% chance for 1. That way we could āloseā money on soft (then transfer it back to soft) and keep our accounts going longer without limitations.
If sharps never limit, this might work? Actually, i think arbs with 99.5%-100% return would be quite useful and there would still be market for the surebetting subscription for people who are really into arbing.
I think it would be very cool for some additional sports to be added to value bet, especially with recent virus related problems. For example, plenty of games are still being played in table tennis. All of these could be fairly easily implemented in, and would allow for much better returns now and in the future.
And also esports 
there can be another 2 buttons after click on bet:
- ābet not existā
- āodd already changedā
with those data from users you can automatically recheck match/bet for one bookmaker or hide match/bet
1 Like
Esports would be AWESOME at this moment. Donāt know nothing about it but seems to be one of the few āsportsā still played. Lots of bookies offer it also so that should not be a problem
Thanks for your many suggestions! Weāll make sure to take this into consideration.
As I have mentioned months ago, a small issue of this software is that it mainly compare value to Pinnacle odds. But in the market Singbet (188 and many clones), ISN can get bigger limits than Pinnacle. So we need to check the bookie list everytime to determine whether the value bets are real value. If more than 1 Asian bookie are suggested āvalueā, they are probably not.
Any chance we can get some more US friendly sportsbooks? Ones that come to mind are BetDSI and Bovada.
Yes, we have plans to add more US bookmakers as the markets open up in the US.
How are the plans going to add more USA bookies? I have some suggestions: Mybookie, Bovada, Betus, thatās all I can think of for now, but the addition would make a lot of difference!
Thank you
Adam.
1 Like
Hi, can you also add BETMGM, as they are opening availability across the USA very soon!
how about the ability to run reports for a specific time period such as a report for the last month?
2 Likes
- add Coolbet
- ability to see the next matches/events starting or the ones ongoing for some painful railing
- closing line for the bookmaker
- How the match/event ended. Now its just win/lose/void. A result like 3-1 would be nice
Bonus: being able to add several bookies to the same bet. I just combine them to a single bet if I bet on PAF+Unibet, for example, as I dont see the harm in this. I guess the upside of this feature would be that you would better know the sites to fool around with for some poker+slots etc.
1 Like
- when on mobile if I delete several bets the āpop upsā quickly come on the way of deleting more bets. Some change in the UI would be nice
- being able to select which leagues to bet on. There is no way I will place a bet on the Icelandic 2nd division etc and I think I skip about 80% of the suggested bets.
Why are you deleting several bets? That should not be a common use case. We will add a āclear bettrackerā feature for those that have paper traded and then want to start for real.
Weāve been thinking about this but Iām not sure how it could be solved.
First we thought of an āevent tierā filter. So tier 1 is Champions League, Premier League, La Liga etc.
The problem is that this gets quite arbitrary when comparing across countries. So level 2 in the UK would be the Championship or League One. This is definitely not comparable to the Swedish tier 2 (Superettan) when it comes to market size, bookmaker priority and risk management etc.
Appreciate ideas on how to solve this, without adding some horribly convoluted UI.
Another idea is to use the Pinnacle average bet size limit as a way to gauge tier.